The Illusion of Understanding: AI, Language and Self-perception
Abstract
humans, to translate tons of different languages within seconds, and even to engage in some philosophical debates. But does AI understand
language in depth, or does it only manipulate grammar and symbols? Relying on AI is not just about efficiencyit may change how people
see themselves and how they engage with ideas. If language shapes thought and self-concept, as many theories suggest, then outsourcing linguistic processing to AI risks diminishing cognitive depth and fostering a passive culture of mediocrity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
[2] Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. MIT Press.
[3] Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001). Divergent consequences of success
and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599615.
[4] Li, X. (n.d.). Self-views in East Asian and Western cultures. Unpublished manuscript.
[5] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review,
98(2), 224253.
[6] Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-457.
[7] Searle, J. R. (1990). Is the brains mind a computer program? Scientific American, 262(1), 26-31.
[8] Searle, J. R. (1980). Speech acts and background meaning. In Speech act theory and pragmatics (pp. 221-232). D. Reidel Publishing
Company.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/aitr.v2i10.7134
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.