pisco_log
banner

The Illusion of Understanding: AI, Language and Self-perception

Xinzhu Li

Abstract


AI has reached such a level of linguistic sophistication that it is now able to produce text indistinguishable from that written by
humans, to translate tons of different languages within seconds, and even to engage in some philosophical debates. But does AI understand
language in depth, or does it only manipulate grammar and symbols? Relying on AI is not just about efficiencyit may change how people
see themselves and how they engage with ideas. If language shapes thought and self-concept, as many theories suggest, then outsourcing linguistic processing to AI risks diminishing cognitive depth and fostering a passive culture of mediocrity.

Keywords


AI; Language; Self-perception

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.

[2] Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. MIT Press.

[3] Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001). Divergent consequences of success

and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality

and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599615.

[4] Li, X. (n.d.). Self-views in East Asian and Western cultures. Unpublished manuscript.

[5] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review,

98(2), 224253.

[6] Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-457.

[7] Searle, J. R. (1990). Is the brains mind a computer program? Scientific American, 262(1), 26-31.

[8] Searle, J. R. (1980). Speech acts and background meaning. In Speech act theory and pragmatics (pp. 221-232). D. Reidel Publishing

Company.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/aitr.v2i10.7134

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.