pisco_log
banner

Numerical Simulation and Parametric Analysis of Cross-Dipole Acoustic Logging Responses in HTI Formations

Duowang Wu

Abstract


Azimuthal anisotropy in hydrocarbon reservoirs is commonly associated with aligned fractures and differences between the horizontal principal stresses. Accurate identification of formation anisotropy is therefore important for evaluating hydrocarbon sweet spots.
However, the response of four-component dispersion curves to γ remains insufficiently understood, limiting the quantitative use of dispersion data in anisotropy-parameter inversion. To investigate this response, cross-dipole excitation along the X and Y directions was simulated using a velocity–stress staggered-grid finite-difference method with convolutional perfectly matched layers, yielding XX, XY, YX, and
YY array waveforms. With other model conditions fixed, γ was varied from 0.05 to 0.30. Dispersion curves were extracted using weighted
spectral semblance, and the response mechanism was examined in terms of elastic-stiffness variations and borehole-wave propagation. The
results show that increasing γ shifts the principal XX and YX flexural-wave dispersion curves toward lower slowness, with larger slowness
shifts at low to intermediate frequencies, whereas the YY component changes only slightly. γ affects the X-polarized flexural-wave velocity primarily by changing c66. The high-slowness trajectories in the XY component are attributed mainly to Stoneley waves. These results
clarify the relationship between γ and the four-component dispersion responses and provide a numerical basis for anisotropy-parameter
identification in HTI formations.

Keywords


Cross-dipole acoustic logging; Staggered-grid finite-difference method; Dispersion curves; Thomsen parameter γ

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] THOMSEN L. Weak elastic anisotropy[J]. Geophysics, 1986, 51(10): 1954-1966.

[2] WU X G, JI F L, LI D C. Application status and research progress of dipole acoustic logging technology[J]. Progress in Geophysics,

2016, 31(1): 380-389 (in Chinese).

[3] ALFORD R M. Shear data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy: Dilley, Texas[C]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1986.

Houston: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1986: 476-479.

[4] SINHA B K, NORRIS A N, CHANG S K. Borehole flexural modes in anisotropic formations[J]. Geophysics, 1994, 59(7): 1037-1052.

[5] CHENG N, CHENG C H, TOKSÖZ M N. Borehole wave propagation in three dimensions[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of

America, 1995, 97(6): 3483-3493.

[6] WANG R J, QIAO W X, JU X D, et al. Experimental study of acoustic fields excited by dipole sources with different polarization directions in a borehole penetrating an HTI formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(2): 707-717 (in Chinese).

[7] KOMATITSCH D, MARTIN R. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave

equation[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(5): SM155-SM167.

[8] VIRIEUX J. P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method[J]. Geophysics, 1986, 51(4): 889-901.

[9] MOCZO P, KRISTEK J, VAVRYÄŒUK V, et al. 3D heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-difference modeling of seismic motion with

volume harmonic and arithmetic averaging of elastic moduli and densities[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2002,

92(8): 3042-3066.

[10] KIMBALL C V, MARZETTA T L. Semblance processing of borehole acoustic array data[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(3): 274-281.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/frim.v4i9.10221

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.