Research on the Mechanisms of Industry–University–Research Collaborative Cultivation of Interdisciplinary Pharmaceutical R&D Talents: A Theoretical Framework
Abstract
at the national strategic level, among which an important one is "greatly improving the level of scientific and technological self-reliance and
self-strengthening, " which undoubtedly creates a favorable environment for innovation. As one of the seven strategic emerging industries,
biomedicine occupies an unmistakable position. As people are the subjects of innovation, how to achieve breakthroughs in complex innovative drug R&D through high-quality interdisciplinary talent has become a research topic in the human resources centers of many enterprises.
Through past cases and domestic and international literature, industry–university–research (IUR) collaboration is undoubtedly an important
path for cultivating interdisciplinary talent for complex innovative drug R&D. Existing studies mostly start from the perspective of universities; this paper, from the perspective of enterprises, explores cross-academic–industrial learning, the embedding of knowledge carriers, and
the industrial translation of basic research, and proposes three core mechanisms for realizing IUR collaborative cultivation—dual appointment and dual salary for mentors, talent and resource sharing, and project market translation management—thereby constructing a theoretical
framework for IUR collaborative cultivation of interdisciplinary pharmaceutical R&D talent. The paper defines the connotations of the three
mechanisms and analyzes their pathways in promoting interdisciplinary knowledge integration and the close combination of theory and practice among R&D personnel. The theoretical contribution of this paper lies in distilling an IUR collaborative cultivation framework in the field
of talent development from an enterprise perspective, revealing the internal logic of "embedding–sharing–translation" collaborative cultivation, and providing a conceptual basis and propositional directions for subsequent empirical research.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] LIU Z Y. Development of the Innovative Drug Industry: Economic Attributes, Key Challenges, and Advancement Pathways[J]. Journal
of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025(3):60–68. (in Chinese)
[2] ZHANG Y, CHEN K H. International Research on Triple-Helix Innovation among "Government–Industry–University": Origin, Advances and Prospects[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2020(5):116–139. (in Chinese)
[3] Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. *Administrative Science
Quarterly*.
[4] Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. *Research Policy*, 29(2), 109–123.
[5] Santoro M D, Chakrabarti A K. Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions[J]. *Research Policy*, 2002,
31(7):1163–1180. DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1.
[6] SU J Q. Transaction Costs and Internalization & Externalization Conditions of Industry–University–Research Cooperative Innovation[J].
*Science Research Management*, 1999, 20(5):68–72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2995.1999.05.012. (in Chinese)
[7] HE Y B. The Theoretical Model of Industry–University–Research Collaborative Innovation[J]. *Studies in Science of Science*, 2012,
30(2):165–174. DOI:CNKI:SUN:KXYJ.0.2012-02-003. (in Chinese)
[8] Zhou J Z, Wan Y G, Gao J. Research on Modes of Industry–University–Research Cooperative Innovation in China[J]. *Science & Technology Progress and Policy*, 2005, 22(3):70–72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7348.2005.03.024.
[9] LIU Y, ZHAO Q N. On the Construction of Industry–University–Research Integration Mechanism for Innovation Talents Cultivation:
A Case Study of the U.S. Science and Technology Center on Real-Time Functional Imaging[J]. *Research in Higher Education of Engineering*, 2020(5):159–164. (in Chinese)
[10] Klein J T. Interdisciplinary: History, Theory, and Practice[J]. *Poetics Today*, 1991, 13(3):1681–1682. DOI:10.2307/1772875.
[11] Gibbons M. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies[J]. *Higher Education Policy*, 1997, 10(1):94–97. DOI:10.1016/S0952-8733(97)89702-4.
[12] Leonard-Barton D. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation[J]. *Social Science Electronic Publishing*, 2009, 22(5):401–402. DOI:10.1016/S0099-1333(96)90108-1.
[13] GU H F. Discussion on the Linkage Mechanism of Talent Training between Universities and Enterprises[J]. *Economic Review*,
2007(20):80–82. DOI:CNKI:SUN:JJZH.0.2007-20-028. (in Chinese)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/frim.v4i9.10241
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
