pisco_log
banner

Literature Review on National Innovation Systems

Yonghe Xie

Abstract


Schumpeters innovation theory and Lists national system theory, there has been a growing number of related research outcomes. This article summarizes different research findings on the concept of the national innovation system and reviews related studies on
its composition, the role of its elements, and the relationships between organizations. Furthermore, it provides an overview of research outcomes on national innovation systems from different levels and concludes with an introduction to the development evaluation of national
innovation systems.

Keywords


National innovation system; Technological innovation; Government support

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Feng Zhijun. Theory and Policy of the National Innovation System. Group Opinions, 1999(02): 22-29.

[2] Liu Xuelin, Ma Chi, Tang Shiguo. What is the National Innovation System. Quantitative & Technical Economics, 1999(05):20-22.

[3] Hu Changping, Qiu Yunsheng. On the National Innovation System and Its Institutional Arrangements. China Soft Science, 2000(09):

121-125.

[4] NASIEROWSKI W, ARCELUS F J. Interrelationships among the elements of national systems:a statistical evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 119(2):235-253.

[5] LOOY B V, DEBACKERE K, CALLAERT J, et al. Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation

systems:an exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(2).

[6] CASTELLACCI F, NATERA J M. The dynamics of national innovation systems:a panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 2013, 42(3):579-594.

[7] Nageswaran Kumaresan, Kumiko Miyazaki. Managementand Policy Concerns over Shifts in Innovation Trajectories:The Case of the

Japanese Robotics Industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.2001.13(3):433-462.

[8] David Newlands. Competition and Cooperation in Industrial Clusters:The Implications for PublicPolicy. European Planning Studies.

2003, 11(5):521-532.

[9] Daniel Hallencreutz, Per Lundequist. Spatial Clustering and the Potential for Policy Practice:Experiences from Cluster building Processes in Sweden. European Planning Studies.2003 11(5):533-547.

[10] Graham Spinardi. Industrial Exploitation of Carborn Fibrein the UK, USA and Japan. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.2002, 14(4):381-398.

[11] Claire Nauwelaers, Rene Wintjes. Innovating SMEs and Regions:The Need for Policy Intelligence and Interactive Policy. Technology

Analysis & Strategic Management.2002, 14(2):201-215.

[12] Harald Bathelt. Geographies of production: Growth regimes in spatial perspectivel-innovation, institutions and social systems. Progress

in Human Geography.2003, 27(6):763-778.

[13] Juha Kostiainen, Markku Sotarauta. Building a Knowledge Economy in Ireland Through European Research Network. European Planning Studies. 2003, 11(4):395-413.

[14] Sonja Koehler, Ulrich Wurzel. From Transnational R&D Co-operation to Regional Economic Co-operation:EU-Style Technology Policies in the MENA Region. Mediterranean Politics.2003, 8(1):83-112.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/frim.v2i8.5159

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.