From Rhetorical Strategies to Critical Judgment: 
Language Manipulation and Cognitive Reflection in the 
Context of Generative AI

Qingling Li

doi:10.70711/frim.v3i2.6048

From Rhetorical Strategies to Critical Judgment: Language Manipulation and Cognitive Reflection in the Context of Generative AI

Qingling Li

Abstract

Generative AI technologies, such as ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs), have revolutionized the way we interact
with and understand language. These systems, designed to generate human-like text, employ complex rhetorical strategies that often blur the
lines between persuasion and manipulation. This paper explores the intersection of rhetoric, critical judgment, and cognitive reflection in the
context of generative AI. By analyzing the rhetorical frameworks employed by AI systems and their impact on human cognition, this study
aims to provide a theoretical foundation for understanding how AI reshapes language dynamics in digital communication. Through detailed
examples of AI applications in diverse contexts such as education, advertising, and social media, the findings highlight the importance of fostering critical thinking skills to navigate AI-generated content effectively.

Keywords

Generative AI; Rhetorical strategies; Critical judgment; Language manipulation; Cognitive reflection

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database

References

[1] Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Herman, L., Mahari, R., Frank, M., Groh, M., Schroeder, H., Smith, A., Akten, M., Fjeld, J., Farid, H.,

Leach, N., Pentland, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI. Science, 380, 1110 - 1111. https://doi.

org/10.1126/science.adh4451.

[2] Lin, Z. (2023). Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI.. Nature biomedical engineering. https://doi.

org/10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8.

[3] Park, S. (2023). Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence, Including Large Language Models Such as ChatGPT, in Scientific Publications: Policies of KJR and Prominent Authorities. Korean Journal of Radiology, 24, 715 - 718. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.0643.

[4] Piller, E. (2024). Inhuman Rhetoric: Generative AI and Crisis Communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241280594.

[5] Sengar, S., Hasan, A., Kumar, S., & Carroll, F. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications. ArXiv,

abs/2405.11029. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.11029.

[6] Wang, Z. (2024). Post-Rhetoric: A Rhetorical Profile of the Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot. Rhetoric Review, 43, 155 - 172.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2024.2351723.

[7] Yan, X., Xiao, Y., & Jin, Y. (2024). Generative Large Language Models Explained [AI-eXplained]. IEEE Computational Intelligence

Magazine, 19, 45-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2024.3431454.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/frim.v3i2.6048

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.