pisco_log
banner

The Construction of Doctor-Patient Alignment: A Discourse Analysis of Epistemic Modal Verbs in Doctor-Patient Conversations

Shiyu Feng

Abstract


In doctor-patient conversations, doctors and patients try to communicate efficiently through linguistic strategies to establish alliance and reach an agreed treatment plan. As modal verbs are linguistic resources that express the subjective views and attitudes of speakers,
and alignment is the basis for successful communication, the rational use of modal verbs can promote the establishment of alliance between
the two parties in communication. In this paper, we analyze the framework of English modal verbs, and based on the framework, we analyze
and statistic the use of cognitive modal verbs by doctors and patients respectively. It is found that doctors tend to use high and median modal
verbs, reflecting the doctors desire to make patients share the same knowledge and opinions as the doctors own through more affirmative
and confident expressions, and ultimately reach an alliance; whereas, patients use low and median modal verbs to make inquiries and describe
their illnesses in the hope that the doctors will give authoritative answers to their questions, and reach an agreement on their illnesses treatment plans. The use of cognitive modal verbs by patients and doctors reflects the efforts of both doctors and patients to build an alliance.

Keywords


Epistemic modal verbs; Doctor-patient conversations; Alignment; Discourse analysis

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Byrne P. S., & Long B. E. L. Doctors Talking to Patients: a Study of the Verbal Behaviours of Doctors in the Consultation [J]. Unlocking

the Power of Health Communication Research, 1976.

[2] Maynard D. W. On clinicians co-implicating recipients' perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news [J]. Talk at work: Interaction in

institutional settings, 1992, 8: 331-358.

[3] Yueguo G. Doctor-patient interaction as goal-directed discourse [J]. Asian-Pacific Communication, 1996, 6: 41-43.

[4] Rabab'ah G., Al-Khanji R. R., Bataineh M. Impoliteness strategies at a Jordanian hospital Emergency Room [J]. Kervan. International

Journal of African and Asian Studies, 2022, 26(1).

[5] Halliday M. A. K. On the grammar of pain [J]. Functions of Language, 1998, 5(1): 1-32.

[6] Lyons J. Semantics (2nd ed.) [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

[7] Perkins M. Modal Expressions in English [M]. London: Frances Printer, 1983.

[8] Coates J. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries [M]. London: Croom Helm, 1983.

[9] Palmer F. R. Mood and Modality (1st Ed. ) [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

[10] Halliday M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd Ed. ) [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.

[11] Klinge A. The English modal auxiliaries: from lexical semantics to utterance interpretation [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1993, 29(2): 315-

357.

[12] Papafragou A. Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface [M]. Brill, 2021.

[13] Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems[M]. MIT Press, 2000.

[14] Cap P. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2008, 40(1):

17-41.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/frim.v3i11.7667

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.