Research on the Precise Path and Countermeasures of 
Community Dispute Mediation

Yibo Lian

doi:10.70711/frim.v4i2.8765

Research on the Precise Path and Countermeasures of Community Dispute Mediation

Yibo Lian

Abstract

With the accelerated change of social structure and the continuous improvement of grassroots governance system, community
disputes are characterized by diversification, sensitivity and complexity. The traditional mediation model is insufficient in mechanism coordination, professional ability and information support. Accurate mediation emphasizes problem-oriented, identifying dispute risks through
data, matching mediation resources and subdividing governance strategies, so as to achieve ' decision-making based on case, decision-making
based on person and decision-making based on situation '. Starting from the evolution trend of community disputes, this paper systematically
analyzes the problems existing in the current mediation mechanism, and puts forward some suggestions on promoting the integration of mediation mechanism, strengthening multiple participation, professional talent support and digital governance empowerment, so as to provide
reference for improving the efficiency of grassroots contradiction resolution and promoting community harmony and stability.

Keywords

Community governance; Dispute mediation; Precision; Modernization of grassroots governance

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database

References

[1] Shao P. Social Governance Community: Connotation Definition, Construction Practice and Optimization Approach[J]. Modern Law Research, 2024, 5(1): DOI:10.37420/J. MLR.2024.006.

[2] Ting Z, Libin Z. The Path of Community Construction for Resolving Social Contradictions and Disputes: Based on the Investigation of

Ningbo[C]//2023: DOI:10.2991/978-2-38476-018-3_25.

[3] Cun Y S. Community Mental Health Care Within Primary Care in the People's Republic of China: The Home Care Program in the Beijing Countryside[J]. International Journal of Mental Health, 2015, 12(3):123-131. DOI:10.1080/00207411.1983.11448956.

[4] Hu J, Tu Y, Wu T. Selective Intervention in Dispute Resolution: Local Government and Community Governance in China[J]. Journal of

Contemporary China, 2018, 27(111):423-439. DOI:10.1080/10670564.2018.1410978.

[5] Changkun C, Ying L, Weiqi J. Bringing the Party Back into the Community: Restructuring Grassroots Governance in Shenzhen[J]. The

China Quarterly, 2023, 254(12):412-428. DOI:10.1017/S0305741023000176.

[6] Hu J, Tu Y, Wu T. Selective Intervention in Dispute Resolution: Local Government and Community Governance in China[J]. Journal of

Contemporary China, 2018, 27(111):423-439. DOI:10.1080/10670564.2018.1410978.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/frim.v4i2.8765

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.