pisco_log
banner

Experimental Study on Factors Affecting Glider Flight Distance

Hengshuo Lu

Abstract


This study investigates how launch angle and wind conditions affect the flight distance of a balsa wood glider, using a lightweight
model with fixed tension and real-time wind data (Wong and Lim, 2017). Results show that a 1.5 launch angle combined with medium
tailwind produced the longest distance (8.07 m), whereas a 5 angle with light headwind resulted in early stall and the shortest distance (2.46
m). These findings confirm that small variations in angle of attack (AoA) and relative airspeed strongly influence lift generation in low-mass
gliders. The study also highlights the high sensitivity of balsa structures to turbulence and minor geometric deviations (Wu et al., 2020). Overall, the results provide practical guidelines for optimizing launch parameters and demonstrate the applicability of basic aerodynamic principles
to small-scale gliders.

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Anderson, J. D. (2020). Introduction to Flight (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education, New York.

[2] Boschetti, G. (2015). Glider Aerodynamics: Principles and Practice. SoarTech Publications.

[3] DeLaurier, J. (1993). An aerodynamic model for balsa wood flying-wing aircraft. AMA Technical Report, 5873.

[4] Du, R. (2024). Construction of a Balsa Wood Model Glider. University of Leeds,

[5] Leeds.

[6] Kajan, K. (2024). Lift Off: Build and Fly in the Glider Challenge. XJFY0100 English for Engineering, 24/25(3), 45-62. SWJTU-Leeds

Joint School, Chengdu.

[7] National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2022). Glider

[8] Aerodynamics Basics. NASA Technical Report TR-2022-001, Washington, D.C.

[9] Wong, J. and Lim, K. (2017). Experimental design and outdoor testing methods for small-scale unpowered aircraft models. Journal of

Aerospace Testing, 12(2), 8597.

[10] Wu, C., Vahedi, N., Vassilopoulos, A. P., & Keller, T. (2020). Mechanical properties of a balsa wood veneer structural sandwich core

material. Construction and Building Materials, 265, 120193.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/itr.v3i2.8659

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.