pisco_log
banner

Research on the Optimization of Government Service Platforms Under the Background of Digital Government Construction

Yang Yang

Abstract


Against the backdrop of the deepening advancement of digital transformation worldwide, the construction of digital government
has become a core strategy for governments in various countries to enhance administrative efficiency, optimize public service delivery,
and modernize governance. As the central vehicle for digital government development, government service platforms play a key role in
connecting government departments with businesses and the public. Their operational efficiency and service quality directly determine
the effectiveness of digital government initiatives. However, many regional government service platforms still face prominent issues such
as insufficient data sharing, fragmented service functions, poor user experience, and inadequate operation and maintenance mechanisms,
which hinder the further progress of digital government construction. This paper begins by defining the core concepts of digital govern
ment and government service platforms and reviewing relevant theoretical foundations. It then analyzes the current status and existing
problems in the construction of these platforms. Finally, it proposes targeted optimization strategies based on practical cases and advanced
experiences. The research aims to provide theoretical references and practical guidance for the optimization and upgrading of government
service platforms, promote the integrated development of digital government and public services, and better meet the diverse service needs
of businesses and the public.

Keywords


Digital Government; Government Service Platform; Platform Optimization; Digital Transformation; Public Service

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Ning K, Lv R. Construction and Operational Optimization of Corporate Financial Shared Service Centers in the Digital Economy Era [J].

Economics?Management Information, 2026, 5(1).

[2] Aluko K, Ayentimi D T, Moloney B, et al. Contextualising HRM in the Digital Age: Local Government Responses to Technological

Change in Australia [J].Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 2025, 64(1): e70049-e.

[3] Ying H. A Study on the Adoption of Digital Technologies by Government Organizations in the Information Age [J]. Global vision re

search, 2025, 2(1).

[4] Vaillant Y, Wamba S F, Rabetino R.AI Platforms for Digital Servitization and Solution Delivery: Where ecosystem, production technol

ogy, and business model trajectories intersect to generate smart solutions [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2026, 292:

109826-.

[5] Wang Y,Wang Z, Meng Z. Digital government governance, supply chain finance empowerment, and enterprise innovation efficiency [J].

Finance Research Letters, 2026, 92: 109521-.

[6] Wu J. Bluer rural skies through digital government transformation: Evidence from a mixed methods study [J]. Journal of Rural Studies,

2026, 122: 103999-.

[7] Cui H,Wen W, Tang Y, et al. The impact of government policy on enterprise digital transformation: evidence from Chinas national civi

lized city award [J].Applied Economics Letters, 2026, 33(3): 422-6.

[8] Kwon M, Park J, Lee E. Understanding the Determinants of Digital Innovations for Crime Prevention and Community Safety in Cali

fornia Local Governments: Perspectives on Civic Engagement and Community Traits [J]. Journal of Applied Security Research, 2026,

21(1): 138-63.

[9] Pobee F, Jibril A B, Shaikh A A, et al. Driving digital transformation in government services in Ghana:A value-creation perspective [J].

Measurement: Digitalization, 2026, 5: 100019-.

[10] Lu L. Digital government as an "intelligent" government: an exploratory study on operational dilemmas and corrective pathways [J].

Advances in Social Behavior Research, 2025, 16(11): 55-61.

[11] Liu S. Mechanisms and Pathways of SMEs Digital Transformation: A GovernmentTechnologyIndustry Synergy Perspective [J]. Do

Business and Trade Facilitation Journal, 2025, 5(2): 57-71.

[12] Trautendorfer J, Hohensinn L, Hilgers D. Contrasting Information Demand and Information Supply: Digital Platforms as Intermediaries

of Citizen-Government Interaction [J]. Information Polity, 2025, 30(4): 321-37.

[13] Johannes Kepler University Linz L, Austria. Outcomes of open government [J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management,

2019, 32(5): 438-56.

[14] Gao B, Jin Q. The Pathway for Modernization Transformation in Government Governance Construction of Digital Intelligent Gov

ernment [J]. Economics&Management Review, 2024, 5(2).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/memf.v3i5.9088

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.