pisco_log
banner

Clinical Characteristics and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infections in a Tertiary Hospital in Chongqing: A Retrospective Study from 2021 to 2024

Lu Yang

Abstract


Objective: Investigate the disease characteristics and AMR profile of tumor patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.
Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of a primary hospital in Chongqing from January 2021 to December 2024.
Results: Among the total number of 722 patients (of whom 501 were male and 221 were female with an average age of 63.6 ± 12.4), most
patients displayed increased inflammatory indicators. 124 males (17.2%) had CRP ? 100 mg/L; 251 individuals (34.8%) showed WBC ?
9.5 × 109 /L; 151 (20.9%) displayed PCT ? 0.5 ?g/L. In patients with pulmonary (n = 195) and otolaryngologic/head neck cancer (n = 150),
infections were seen, and increasing trend by year was seen. The other cases were from gastrointestinal (n=112), hepatobiliary (n=52), and
gynecological (n=48). The antimicrobial susceptibility was still high (?80%) to amikacin(?96.9%), cefe pime, cefepime(ciprofloxacin),
levofloxacin(>80%), meropenem (>80% ), imipenem (>80% ), piperacillin -tazobactam (>80% ), ceftazidime. Cefoperazone-sulbactam susceptibility: ?70% Aztreonam susceptibility: ?50% After the treatment, 108 patients ( 14.9 %) were better and discharged; 46 ( 6.4 %) died.
Conclusions: P. aeruginosa infection of cancer patient has a tendency to correlate with high levels of inflammatory markers and also co-infection is very common in case of immunocompromised patients. Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) rate 8-15%. Strengthen the use of
antibiotics rationally and slow down the development of resistance.

Keywords


Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Drugresistance; Carbapenems; Clinical characteristics

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Azam M W, Khan A U. Updates on the pathogenicity status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drug Discovery Today, 2019, 24(1):350-359.

[2] Thi MTT, Wibowo D, Rehm BHA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(22):8671-8672.

[3] National Microbial Resistance Surveillance Network. 2014-2019 Surveillance Report on Bacterial Resistance Monitoring [J]. Chinese

Journal of Infection Control, 2021, 20(1):15 30. DOI: 10.12138/j.issn.1671 9638.20216170.

[4] Gellatly SL, Hancock RE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses[J]. Pathog Dis, 2013, 67(3):159-

173.

[5] Han Ping, Zhao Jianqing, Zhang Wei et al. Analysis of factors affecting carbon penicillin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial

infection and prognosis [J]. 2025, 44(3):282-288.

[6] Qin J, Zou C, Tao J, et al. Carbapenem resistant Pseu-domonas aeruginosa infections in elderly patients: antimicrobial resistance profiles, risk factors and impact on clinical outcomes [J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2022, 15:2301-2314.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/pmr.v2i7.7716

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.