The Quadruple Logic of Integrating the Scientific Ethos into Cultivating Academic Innovation Competencies in Graduate Students
Abstract
innovative thinkers. Key challenges identified include instrumental motivation imbalance (67% respondents prioritize publication quantity),
institutional rigidity in mentorship models, and declining ethical standards (23% self-reported misconduct). Strategic solutions involve curriculum restructuring with cross-disciplinary modules, mentorship accountability systems, and blockchain-enabled integrity governance. Empirical evidence from MIT-China AI Labs shows interdisciplinary programs boost innovation output by 37%. This study provides actionable
pathways for aligning graduate education with national innovation strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Chinese Association for Science and Technology (2020). The connotation and value of the scientific ethos [J]. Science & Technology
Tribune, 68(1), 5-8.
[2] Wang Hongcai et al. (2020). Current status and future directions of graduate students' innovation capacity evaluation in China [J]. Degree & Graduate Education, 1, 5-15.
[3] Liu Tao et al. (2020). Approaches to cultivating graduate students' innovative capacities [J]. China Pharmaceutical University, 2(2), 48-52.
[4] Zhong et al. (2023). Evaluating collaborative innovation models in graduate education.
[5] Zhao Jianmin (2021). Deep integration of the scientific ethos into higher education [J]. China Higher Education, 12(14-17).
[6] Liu Xiaofeng (2020). Promoting innovation through industry-academic collaboration [J]. Graduate Education, 4(45-48).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/wef.v2i11.7053
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.