pisco_log
banner

The Idea and Practice of Chinese Essence and Western Utility in Late Qing Higher Education and Its Enlightenment for the New Era An Analysis Based on Acculturation Theory

Chuhan Liu

Abstract


This study employs John Berrys acculturation theory as a framework to analyze the practical predicaments and enlightenment of
the Chinese essence and Western utility concept in the modernization of late Qing higher education. The research reveals that this concept
presented three structural contradictions during the cultural adaptation process: the defensive integration of the curriculum system caused a
dichotomy between essence and utility, the institutional segregation of educational tenets exacerbated cultural exclusion, and the student cohort suffered from structural marginalization due to bidirectional cultural conflicts. The root cause lies in the Qing governments insistence
on feudal ideological hegemony, which confined Western utility to technological transplantation and lacked cross-cultural equal dialogue. In
the context of higher education internationalization in the new era, it is essential to focus on the reconstruction of value ontology, and achieve
a dynamic balance between cultural autonomy and openness through the mutual appreciation of knowledge systems, interdisciplinary talent
cultivation, and a collaborative governance mechanism for international students.

Keywords


Chinese Essence and Western Utility; Higher education; Acculturation theory; Educational modernization

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Berry J W. Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In: K Chun, P B Organista, G Marin (Eds.). Acculturation: Advances in Theory,

Measurement, and Applied Research. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2003: 1737.

[2] Yao Cuiwei. A study on the educational system of "Chinese essence and Western utility" in the late Qing Self-Strengthening Movement [J].

Lantai World, 2015(19).

[3] Bao Jun et al. (eds.). Records of Handling Barbarian Affairs (Tongzhi Reign). Guangxu 6th year edition, Vol. 47.

[4] Zheng Guanying. Warnings in an Age of Prosperity. Zhongzhou Ancient Books Press, 1893/1995.

[5] Li Hongzhang. Original letter from Li Hongzhang, Governor of Jiangsu Province, to the Grand Council [A]. 1864.

[6] Feng Guifen. Protests from the Bin Studio. Shanghai: Shanghai Bookstore Press, 2002.

[7] Tang Zhijun, Chen Zuen (eds.). Education During the Reform Period: Compilation of Historical Materials on Modern Chinese Education. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press, 1993 (1st ed.).

[8] Cai Zhensheng. Study on Zhang Zhidongs Educational Thoughts. Shenyang: Liaoning Education Press, 1994 (1st ed.).

[9] Zheng Dengyun. A History of Chinese Higher Education (Vol. 1). Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 1994: 44.

[10] Chen Jingpan. A History of Modern Chinese Education. Beijing: Peoples Education Press, 1979: 188.

[11] Chen Xuexun. Teaching Reference Materials for the History of Modern Chinese Education (Vol. 1). Beijing: Peoples Education Press,

1986: 564.

[12] Li Xisuo. "Aura imbalance": A humanistic interpretation of the marginalization of late Qing international studentsCase studies of

Rong Hong and Yan Fu [J]. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2011(02): 122125.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/wef.v2i11.7069

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.