A Study on the Current State of Social Cognition of Nature Education and Optimization Pathways
Abstract
stratification, a "high motivation but low action" contradiction in participation, and a dilemma of unmet expectations in courses. These stem
from lacking industry standards, inadequate faculty professionalism, and limited accessible channels.
Corresponding proposals include: building a diversified curriculum via stratification and technological empowerment; enhancing policy inclusiveness through resource integration mechanisms; and strengthening teacher training with tiered certification. The goal is to elevate nature
education as an ecological civilization tool, providing empirical support for policymaking and industry upgrading.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Zhai, K. (2025). Development status and countermeasures of nature education under the concept of ecological civilization. Rural Science Experiment, (01), 5153.
[2] Liu, L. (2022). Nature education: Theoretical connotations and value implications. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 24(06), 667673.
[3] Li, Z. (2021). Research on the construction of the forest welfare service system in South Korea: An analysis based on South Korea's forestry development concepts, mechanisms, and experience. Forestry Economics, 43(04), 5769.
[4] Fang, X. (2024). Current development status and optimization strategies of nature education in Langshan National Forest Park. China
Urban Forestry, 22(02), 165169.
[5] Li, X., & Yu, Y. (2017). A study on nature education practices at home and abroad. Forestry Economics, 39(11), 1218, 23.
[6] Wang, X., Huang, S., Hu, W., et al. (2020). Analysis of the development status and standardization needs of China's nature education
industry. Quality Exploration, 17(03), 1821.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/eer.v3i3.8714
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
