The Impact of Teacher-student Relationship on Students' Academic Satisfaction in Calligraphy Aesthetic Education: With Academic Self-efficacy, Coping Styles, and Grit as Mediators
Abstract
aesthetic education, as well as the mediating effects of coping styles and self-efficacy in this process. Taking 500 college students from 5
universities offering calligraphy aesthetic education courses as the research subjects, this study collected data through questionnaires. An
empirical model was constructed with "teacher-student relationship" as the explanatory variable, self-efficacy, coping styles and grit as
mediating variables, and academic satisfaction as the explained variable, and relevant hypotheses were tested. The results show that the
teacher-student relationship in calligraphy aesthetic education has a positive impact on academic satisfaction, and self-efficacy, coping
styles and grit also play positive mediating roles between the two. This study holds that in calligraphy aesthetic education, teachers should
focus on guiding college students to improve teacher-student relationship, cultivate self-efficacy, optimize coping styles and develop grit,
so as to enhance students' academic satisfaction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Appleton-Knapp, S. L., & Krentler, K. A. (2006). Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: The importance of
managing student expectations. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(3), 254264.
[2] Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 10871101.
[3] Du, H. M., Wang, K. W., Shao, X. P., et al. (2003). A survey on graduate students' satisfaction with the present situation of graduate education in higher education. Journal of Chongqing University, (6), 161163. (In Chinese)
[4] Jaeger, R. M. (1978). Chapter 7: About educational indicators: Statistics on the conditions and trends in education. In Review of Research in Education (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 276315).
[5] Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
[6] Niu, K. H. (2017). Current situation, problems and countermeasures of college students' learning process evaluation: A survey based on
16 undergraduate universities nationwide. University Education Science, (6), 4249+121. (In Chinese)
[7] Printz, B. L., Shermis, M. D., & Webb, P. M. (1999). Stress-buffering factors related to adolescent coping: A path analysis. Adolescence,
34(136), 761778.
[8] Schwarzer, R., & Renner, B. (2009). Health-specific self-efficacy scales (14th ed.). Freie Universitt Berlin.
[9] Walker, J. D., & Baepler, P. (2017). Measuring social relations in new classroom spaces: Development and validation of the Social Context and Learning Environments (SCALE) Survey. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 3441.
[10] Zhang, D. C. (2023). A classification analysis of "45-degree youth" and the cultivation of the spirit of striving. Journal of Yunnan University (Social Sciences Edition), (6), 94101. (In Chinese)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/eer.v3i3.8724
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.