Research on the Time-Point Prediction Model for NIPT Based on DOA-CEO Optimization Algorithm
Abstract
prenatal test for best results. That's the problem we tackled. We built a prediction model that mixes machine learning with some custom optimization tricks. The model uses what we call a DOA-CEO algorithma hybrid that pulls together the strengths of two different approaches.
DOA brings strong search capability while CEO adds randomness that keeps things from getting stuck. Together they tune the model's grouping settings and starting weights. We tested the approach across 11, 033 real clinical cases. Results show the model performs well within
5% error margins. The R value hit 0.984, which we'd consider pretty good. When we look at error distribution, 95.3% of predictions stayed
within that 5% detection band. We compared our method against standard multiple linear regression and the basic DOA approachboth of
them fell short on prediction errors. The hybrid algorithm also converged noticeably faster, clocking about 34.6% improvement over the original DOA alone. What this means: we now have a tool that estimates when NIPT should run and what risk level to expect. Clinicians could use
this when designing personalized testing schedules for their patients. The work gives both a scientific foundation and something practical to
work with in real hospital settings.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Ju Aiping, Meng Xiangrong, Qin Yanling, et al. Application value of non-invasive prenatal testing in screening fetal chromosomal copy
number variations [J]. Practical Electrocardiology and Clinical Diagnostics, 2025, 34(05): 665-671.
[2] Pan Shuqing, Pan Xiaoli, Ge Lisha, et al. Application value of non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening [J]. Zhejiang Medicine, 2024, 46(17): 1881-1884.
[3] Peng Yuan, Huang Xiaoli. Analysis of the application value of non-invasive prenatal testing in screening fetal chromosomal copy
number variations [J]. Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research, 2024, 35(02): 86-93.
[4] Zhong Jiatong, Hu Liang, Wen Lijuan, et al. Characteristics of fetal cell-free DNA concentration in twin pregnancies with noninvasive prenatal testing and analysis of causes of test failure [J]. Chinese Journal of Prenatal Diagnosis (Electronic Edition), 2023,
15(03): 25-30.
[5] Kong Lingrong, Sun Luming. Application of non-invasive prenatal testing in screening fetal chromosomal aneuploidies [J]. Journal of
Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023, 39(02): 98-102.
[6] Ling Yingcong, Sun Shuxiang, Xu Jinmei, et al. Genetic analysis of 152 cases with high risk of sex chromosome abnormalities indicated
by non-invasive prenatal testing [J]. China Practical Medicine, 2022, 17(27): 122-125.
[7] Jiang Liya, Lu Shaokan, Du Jiaen, et al. Development and application of non-invasive prenatal testing technology [J]. Clinical Medicine
Research and Practice, 2025, 10(23): 191-194.
[8] Yingchao Dong, Shaohua Zhang, Hongli Zhang, Xiaojun Zhou, Jiading Jiang. Chaotic evolution optimization: A novel metaheuristic
algorithm inspired by chaotic dynamics [J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2025, 192: 116049.
[9] Ali Reza Sajun, Imran Zualkernan, Donthi Sankalpa. A Historical Survey of Advances in Transformer Architectures [J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(10): 4316.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/aitr.v4i1.9652
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.