pisco_log
banner

Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Advances and Challenges in Electrocatalytic Performance

Hangcheng Liu

Abstract


Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are promising clean-energy technologies due to their high efficiency, high power
density, rapid start-up, and zero local emissions. However, their large-scale commercialization is limited by the cost, activity, and durability of
electrocatalysts, particularly those used for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Although Pt-based and Pt-alloy catalysts remain the most effective options, issues such as catalyst degradation, carbon corrosion, and mass-transport limitations continue to affect long-term performance.
Recent advances in alloy design, core–shell structures, single-atom catalysts, non-precious-metal catalysts, and catalyst-layer engineering have
improved catalytic activity and durability. Future research should focus on integrated catalyst, support, ionomer, and membrane-electrode assembly design to achieve lower cost, higher durability, and practical fuel-cell performance under real operating conditions.

Keywords


Proton exchange membrane fuel cells; PEMFC; Electrocatalyst; Oxygen reduction reaction; Platinum catalyst

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Borup R, Meyers J, Pivovar B, et al. Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation[J]. Chemical Reviews,

2007, 107(10): 3904-3951.

[2] Debe M K. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells[J]. Nature, 2012, 486(7401): 43-51.

[3] Gasteiger H A, Kocha S S, Sompalli B, et al. Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2005, 56(1-2): 9-35.

[4] Kongkanand A, Mathias M F. The priority and challenge of high-power performance of low-platinum proton-exchange membrane fuel

cells[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2016, 7(7): 1127-1137.

[5] Li J, Jaouen F. Structure and activity of metal-centered coordination sites in pyrolyzed metal–nitrogen–carbon catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of O2[J]. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 2019, 17: 1-8.

[6] Marković N M, Ross P N. Surface science studies of model fuel cell electrocatalysts[J]. Surface Science Reports, 2002, 45(4-6): 117-

229.

[7] Shao M, Chang Q, Dodelet J P, et al. Recent advances in electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2016,

116(6): 3594-3657.

[8] Stamenkovic V R, Fowler B, Mun B S, et al. Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni(111) via increased surface site availability[J].

Science, 2007, 315(5811): 493-497.

[9] Tian X, Zhao X, Su Y Q, et al. Engineering bunched Pt–Ni alloy nanocages for efficient oxygen reduction in practical fuel cells[J]. Science, 2019, 366(6467): 850-856.

[10] Wang Y J, Zhao N, Fang B, et al. Carbon-supported Pt-based alloy electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Particle size, shape, and composition manipulation and their impact to activity[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2015,

115(9): 3433-3467.

[11] Wu G, More K L, Johnston C M, et al. High-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction derived from polyaniline, iron, and

cobalt[J]. Science, 2011, 332(6028): 443-447.

[12] Zhang J, ed. PEM fuel cell electrocatalysts and catalyst layers: Fundamentals and applications[M]. London: Springer, 2008.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/frim.v4i7.9861

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.