On the Construction of External Discourse Regarding the Cross-cultural English Translation of Sanxingdui Cultural Terminology from the Perspective of Language Security
Abstract
controls the narrative. Take "Zongmu masks"—swallowed by Western jargon, or over-domesticated till the sacred leaks out. But semantic
decay spreads—from objects to rituals to how we define the civilization itself. Chaos doesn't just confuse; it silences native voices. Fix it with
"phonetic pinning" (anchor the sound) plus "semantic padding". Not a wall—a flexible matrix: uniform labels up top, deep context underneath. A blueprint for ideas to travel far without getting hollowed out.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Li, Y. Linguistic security risks and standardized translation of cultural heritage terminology in cross-cultural dissemination[J]. Language
and Intercultural Communication, 2022, 22(3): 312-328.
[2] Wang, H. Cross-cultural translation and discourse construction of Chinese archaeological cultural symbols[M]. Newcastle upon Tyne:
Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2021: 56-71.
[3] Li S E, Wang X M. The Aphasia Predicament and Construction Path of the External Translation of Chinese Archaeological Cultural
Terms from the Perspective of Language Security[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Terminology, 2022, 24(04):45-51.
[4] Chen X. Research on the Chaos and Standardization Strategies of English Translation of Sanxingdui Cultural Proper Terms[J]. Sichuan
Cultural Relics, 2023(02):112-118.
[5] Zhang J. Reconstruction of External Discourse Narratives of Regional Archaeological Culture from the Perspective of Cross-Cultural
Communication—Taking the External Translation and Introduction of Sanxingdui Culture as an Example[J]. Media Forum, 2021,
4(18):13-15.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/rcha.v4i7.10093
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
