pisco_log
banner

Differences in the Definition of an Author under Copyright Laws of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany in the Context of Artificial Intelligence

Bo Yun

Abstract


In modern copyright law, which began with Queen Annes Law, the author plays a very important role as the subject of the work. As
such, identifying the authors identity is a matter of priority.
??As science and technology advances, granting author status to anyone has been discussed under copyright law since Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony in 1884, and the development of artificial intelligence technology is again an issue of legal issues concerning the confirmation of author status of artificial intelligence products. Though it was thought that artificial intelligence products should be protected by
law, the problem is that only creations expressing human thoughts or emotions can be protected under the current copyright law. In addition,
only human beings can be recognized as authors in precedents and theories.
??This paper introduces the author problem of the distant, recent issue of artificial intelligence products and review the authors concept
through content on the authors concept of Anglo-American and continental law countries.

Keywords


Author; Artificial Intelligence; Artificial Intelligence-generated artifact; Artificial Intelligence creator; User

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Annemarie Bridy, Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author, Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol.5, 2012, p.3; Christopher uccafusco, A Theory of Copyright Authorship, Virginia Law Review, Vol.102, 2016, p.1255

[2] Peter Jaszi, Toward a Theory of Copyright: The Metamorphoses of Authorship, Duke Law Journal, Vol.40 No.2, 1991, p.468

[3] John Feather, Publishing, Piracy and Politics-Historical Study of Copyright in Britain, Mansell, 1994, p.51

[4] Holly C. Lynch, What Do an Orangutan and a Corporation Have in Common?: Whether the Copyright Protection Afforded to Corporations Should Extend to Works Created by Animals, Ohio Northern University Law Review Vol.42 Issue 1, 2015, p.270

[5] Victor M. Palace, What if Artificial Intelligence wrote this? Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law, Florida Law Review, Vol.71, 2019, p.228.

[6] Final Report, National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works(1979)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.