pisco_log
banner

Balancing Truth and Pragmatism -- Media Ethics in the Age of Fake News

Yang Jing

Abstract


In the rapid development of the information age, The goal of this paper is to explore how the media can cope with the ethical challenges when reporting news, especially the responsibility and moral dilemma when dealing with fake news and false information.By comparing and analyzing Kants and Machiavellis two completely different ethical views, this paper aims to explore how the media can find a balance between maintaining moral standards and practical operation in the current environment. We will discuss how the media should adhere to
moral principles in the face of temptation and pressure, and explore how to effectively deal with the spread of fake news and false information
in practice.

Keywords


News reporting; Responsibility; Ethical perspective

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] BBC. (2016, December 2). The saga of pizzagate: The fake story that shows how conspiracy theories spread. BBC News.

[2] BBWard, K. (2018). Social networks, the 2016 US presidential election, and Kantian ethics: applying the categorical imperative to Cambridge Analyticas behavioral microtargeting. Journal of Media Ethics, 33(3), 133148. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2018.1477047

[3] Bluemle, S. R. (2018). Post-Facts: Information Literacy and Authority after the 2016 Election. Portal (Baltimore, Md.), 18(2), 265282.

https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2018.0015

[4] Stroud, S. R. (2019). Pragmatist Media Ethics and the Challenges of Fake News. Journal of Media Ethics, 34(4), 178192. https://doi.or

g/10.1080/23736992.2019.1672554

[5] Ward, K. (2018). Social networks, the 2016 US presidential election, and Kantian ethics: applying the categorical imperative to Cambridge

Analyticas behavioral microtargeting. Journal of Media Ethics, 33(3), 133148. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2018.1477047000


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.