Duji Renqing

The Intersection of Documentary Film and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Making a Murderer and O.J.: Made in America

Duji Renqing

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of documentaries, particularly Making a Murderer and O.J.: Made in America, on public perception of the U.S. justice system and their role in stimulating discussions on legal reform. By employing the Spiral of Silence theory, the
study examines how these documentaries shape public discourse by reinforcing or suppressing different judicial viewpoints, thus influencing
public opinion and potential policy changes. Through case studies of Steven Avery and O.J. Simpson, the documentaries highlight systemic
flaws, media biases, and the complex interplay between race, celebrity, and justice. The paper also discusses the limitations of the Spiral of
Silence theory in the modern media landscape, where social media offers platforms for minority opinions, challenging traditional medias
dominance in shaping public opinion.

Keywords

Documentaries; Media bias; Public opinion; Social media influence

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database

References

[1] Bakhshay, Shirin, and Craig Haney. The Medias Impact on the Right to a Fair Trial: A Content Analysis of Pretrial Publicity in Capital

Cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, vol. 24, no. 3, Aug. 2018, pp. 326340, https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000174.

[2] BOYKOFF, JULES. Limiting Dissent: The Mechanisms of State Repression in the USA. Social Movement Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, 22

Nov. 2007, pp. 281310, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830701666988.

[3] Chancer, Lynn. GENDER, CLASS and RACE in THREE HIGH PROFILE CRIMES: THE CASES of NEW BEDFORD, CENTRAL

PARK and BENSONHURST. Journal of Crime and Justice, vol. 17, no. 2, Jan. 1994, pp. 167187, https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.1

994.9721519. Accessed 4 May 2020.

[4] ERICKSON, RICHARD V. MASS MEDIA, CRIME, LAW, and JUSTICE. The British Journal of Criminology, vol. 31, no. 3, 1991,

pp. 219249, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048114. Accessed 3 May 2019.

[5] Hantler, Steven, et al. EXTENDING the PRIVILEGE to LITIGATION COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALISTS in the AGE of TRIAL by MEDIA. 2004.

[6] Kennedy, Liam. Man Im All Torn up Inside: Analyzing Audience Responses ToMaking a Murderer. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, 24 July 2017, pp. 391408, https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659017721275.

[7] Mccombs, Maxwell. The Agenda-Setting Role of the Mass Media in the Shaping of Public Opinion. ResearchGate, 2011, www.researchgate.net/publication/237394610_The_Agenda-Setting_Role_of_the_Mass_Media_in_the_Shaping_of_Public_Opinion.

[8] Persak, Nina. Beyond Public Punitiveness: The Role of Emotions in Criminal Law Policy. International Journal of Law, Crime and

Justice, vol. 57, June 2019, pp. 4758, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.02.001. Accessed 6 Dec. 2020.

[9] Robbennolt, Jennifer K., and Christina A. Studebaker. News Media Reporting on Civil Litigation and Its Influence on Civil Justice Decision Making. Law and Human Behavior, vol. 27, no. 1, 2003, pp. 527, www.jstor.org/stable/1394498. Accessed 30 Apr. 2024.

[10] ROBERTS, JULIAN V. Public Opinion, Criminal Record, and the Sentencing Process. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 39, no. 4,

Feb. 1996, pp. 488499, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764296039004011.

[11] Xiong, Fei, and Yun Liu. Opinion Formation on Social Media: An Empirical Approach. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 24, no. 1, Mar. 2014, p. 013130, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866011.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.