A Conversation Analysis of Blooming Flowers from the Perspective of Face Theory
Abstract
interpersonal relationship construction. Using conversational analysis, it transcribes and annotates the dialogues, then applies face theory
for deeper analysis. Findings reveal the dual dimensions of face: positive face, maintained through self-praise and compliments, and negative face, threatened by conflicts but mitigated with humor and friendly language. Additionally, the dialogues not only preserve face but also
strengthen emotional bonds, reflecting care and support among characters. These insights enhance the understanding of face theory in TV
drama dialogues and offer a fresh perspective on face-saving and relationship dynamics in social interaction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[2] Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987) Universals in Language Usage: Politeness phenomenon. Cambridge: CUP.
[3] Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.
[4] Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
[5] Suo, Zhenyu. Pragmatics: A Coursebook (Second Edition) [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2014.
[6] He, Zhaoxiong. An Outline of Pragmatics (New Edition) [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2000..
[7] Huang, Lihua. A Conversational Analysis of Fortress Besieged from the Perspective of Face Theory [J]. Jingu Wenchuang, 2024, (04):
116-118.
[8] Chu, Yahui. Female Questioning Behavior in Dating Shows [D]. Advisor: Chen Jing. Hangzhou Normal University, 2022.
[9] Zhang, Yichi. Application of Face Theory in High School English Teaching [J]. Qiuxue, 2020, (04): 51-52.
[10] Wang, Lin. On the Concept of "Face" among Chinese People [D]. Harbin: Heilongjiang University, 2011.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/rcha.v2i9.5599
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.