Critical Plant Studies of Children’s Literature: A Review of Current Research Trends
Abstract
the related discussion in culture, literature, art, philosophy, etc. This kind of study also provides a unique perspective to analyze children’s literature, for the analogy and the soul-interconnection of the child and the plant. In children’s literature, plants often play diverse and dynamic
roles, interacting with child characters as they explore, enjoy, and mature spiritually through their experiences with nature. Besides, the ample
forms of plant representations in children’s literature, such as illustrations or picture books, feature critical plant study of children’s literature
study, making an impact in both ecocriticism and ecopedagogy. This paper aims to explore the roots and climb current research trends, as well
as identify potential gaps and future directions in this developing field. By doing so, it seeks to deal with the phenomenon of plant blindness
through the innocent views of children that reshape the ecological ethics and to realize the materiality and agency of plants in rich imagination, which extends the border of ecological literacy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Åkerholm, K., & Höglund, H. (2024). Cultivating Response-ability in Secondary Literary Education: Staying with the Trouble with/in
Lisen Adbåge’s Picturebook Furan. Children’s Literature in Education.
[2] Duckworth, M., & Guanio-Uluru, L. (2021). Plants in Children’s and Young Adult Literature. Routledge.
[3] Duckworth, M., & Herb, A. (Eds.). (2023). Storying Plants in Australian Children’s and Young Adult Literature: Roots and Winged
Seeds. Springer Nature Switzerland.
[4] Duckworth, M., Guanio-Uluru, L., & Herb, A. (2024). Plant Tendrils in Children’s and Young Adult Literature. Ecozon@: European
Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 15(1), 1–6.
[5] Gaard, G. (2009). Children’s Environmental Literature: From Ecocriticism to Ecopedagogy. Neohelicon, 36(2), 321–334.
[6] Goga, N., Guanio-Uluru, L., Hallås, B. O., & Nyrnes, A. (Eds.). (2018). Ecocritical Perspectives on Children’s Texts and Cultures.
Springer International Publishing.
[7] Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
[8] Hind, S. (2024). “The Trees Got Their Own Ways to Hurt us”: Entangled Bodies and Fragile Flesh in M.R. Carey’s “The Book of Koli”
(2020). Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 15(1), 7–21.
[9] Hu, L. (2024). Seeds of Change: Negotiating Hierarchies in Seed Picturebook Stories. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 15(1), 22–38.
[10] Jones, V., & MacLeod, C. (2024). Why Children Need to Read about Plants at a Time of Climate Change. Children’s Literature in Education, 55(3), 416–431.
[11] Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press.
[12] Marder, M., et al. (2013). Plant-thinking. Columbia University Press.
[13] Miller, E. C. (2016). Dendrography and Ecological Realism. Victorian Studies, 58(4), 696-718.
[14] Ryan, J. C. (2021). Writing the lives of plants: Phytography and the botanical imagination. In Life writing in the Anthropocene (pp. 94-
119). Routledge.
[15] Slovic, S., & Chou, S. S. (Eds.). (2022). Arboreal Ecocriticism. Special issue of Lagoonscapes: The Venice Journal of Environmental
Humanities, 2(2).
[16] Zhang, C. (2024). “To see with eyes unclouded”: Nonhuman selves and semiosis in “Princess Mononoke.” Ecozon@: European Journal
of Literature, Culture and Environment, 15(1), 55–72.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/rcha.v3i3.7028
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
