pisco_log
banner

Narrative Hierarchy and Affective Coherence in Cinema: Rethinking the Central Dramatic Question in Where Is the Friend's House? and Blue Gate Crossing

Zilin Wu

Abstract


This article reconsiders the centrality of the "dramatic question" in film narrative theory, which is often understood as the as
sumption that a film must be organised around a single central question in order to achieve narrative coherence. Drawing on narratology
and affect theory, it proposes that coherence emerges not from narrative singularity but from the hierarchical organisation of multiple, in
terrelated questions.
Through a comparative analysis of Where Is the Friend's House? (1987) and Blue Gate Crossing (2002), the article demonstrates that
films can sustain affective restraint while mobilising narrative multiplicity. It further argues that these questions are integrated through a cen
tral affective or epistemological trajectory, often structured around processes of perception and self-recognition rather than external goals.
By reframing the dramatic question as an organising principle rather than a formal constraint, the article contributes to a more flexible
understanding of narrative structure in film.

Keywords


Narrative hierarchy; Dramatic question;Affective coherence;Narrative multiplicity;Art cinema

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Daniel Noah. The Major Dramatic Question[EB/OL]. https://www.writingclasses.com/toolbox/articles/the-major-dramatic-question.

[2] Andrs Blint Kovcs. Screening Modernism: European Art Cinema, 19501980[M]. The University of Chicago Press, 2005(2): 57.

[3] David Bordwell.Narration in the Fiction Film[M]. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985: 206-210.

[4] Carl Plantinga. Moving Viewers:American Film and the Spectator's Experience[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009: 87-

112.

[5] Murray Smith. Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995: 83-88.

[6] Judith Butler. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity[M].New York: Routledge, 1990: 33.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/rcha.v4i3.9314

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.