pisco_log
banner

A Corpus-Based Study of Phrase Frames in Marine Science Research Article Introductions

Lei Yang

Abstract


This paper investigates the rhetorical contribution of phrase frames (p-frames) to research article introductions in marine science.
The analysis draws on a purpose-built corpus of 500 introductions published between 2017 and 2021 in five international journals. Each introduction was annotated according to an adapted Create a Research Space (CARS) move-step framework. Five- and six-word p-frames were
then identified through corpus-based extraction, examined individually in their original contexts, and evaluated by doctoral students in marine
science. This procedure produced a final inventory of 80 five-word and 19 six-word p-frames. Verb-based and other-content-word patterns
together accounted for 85.86% of the inventory, with verb-based structures particularly prominent among the six-word frames. Their rhetorical distribution was uneven: most tokens occurred in Move 1, Establishing a research territory, and Move 3, Presenting the present work.
Functional classification further showed that 54.55% of the frames were non-specialized, 38.38% were semi-specialized, and only 7.07% were
specialized. These findings clarify how recurrent phraseological patterns participate in the organization of marine science introductions and
provide an empirically grounded resource for discipline-specific academic writing instruction.

Keywords


Phrase frames; Academic English writing; Corpus linguistics; Rhetorical move-step analysis

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at..: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics,

25(3), 371-405.

[2] Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of

English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33-43.

[3] Cunningham, K. J. (2017). A phraseological exploration of recent mathematics research articles through key phrase frames. Journal of

English for Academic Purposes, 25, 71-83.

[4] Durrant, P. (2017). Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students' writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165-193.

[5] Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955. In Studies in linguistic analysis (pp. 1-32). Blackwell.

[6] Garner, J. R. (2016). A phrase-frame approach to investigating phraseology in learner writing across proficiency levels. International

Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 2(1), 31-67.

[7] Golparvar, S. E., & Barabadi, E. (2020). Key phrase frames in the discussion section of research articles of higher education. Lingua,

236, 102804.

[8] Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2013). Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1),

109-136.

[9] Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21.

[10] Lu, C., & Coxhead, A. (2025). Specialized multiword units in traditional Chinese medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,

73, 101467.

[11] Lu, X., Yoon, J., & Kisselev, O. (2018). A phrase-frame list for social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 76-85.

[12] Lu, X., Yoon, J., & Kisselev, O. (2021). Matching phrase-frames to rhetorical moves in social science research article introductions.

English for Specific Purposes, 61, 63-83.

[13] Martinez, R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 299-320.

[14] Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4),

487-512.

[15] Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/neet.v4i9.10047

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.