A Study on Online Learning Persistence among College Students in the OMO Context
Abstract
college students are not always able to concentrate on the online classes regularly. Based on the above, this paper will use both a literature
review and interviews. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 faculty members and students from the three universities to learn
about their current situations, motivations, reasons for continuing to take part in online classes under the OMO model, etc. Based on the above
results, it can be concluded that students' interest in online learning generally decreases over time and at different stages. The four main problems in the current OMO model are the lack of student autonomy in online classes, poor integration of online and offline teaching, slow data
feedback, and a weak sense of emotion. Based on the above analysis, we propose to increase the agency of students, revise teaching materials,
improve the usability of platform technology, and create a more supportive emotional environment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Li Kaifu. OMO Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence [J]. World Education Information, 2018(1): 3-5.
[2] Ministry of Education. Action Plan for Educational Informatization 2.0 [Z]. 2018.
[3] Wang Zhuli. A Study on the Phenomenon and Countermeasures of "Dropout" in Online Learning [J]. Modern Distance Education Research, 2020(4): 32-40.
[4] Guan Chunhua, Feng Shen. Factors Influencing and Optimization Strategies for College Students' Online Learning Persistence [J]. Educational Research, 2024(5): 45-49.
[5] Ren Yan. A Study on the Factors Influencing the Persistence of Online Learners' Learning Intentions—From an ECM Perspective[J].
Open Learning Research, 2022(3): 63-72.
[6] Zimmerman B J. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview[J]. Theory Into Practice, 2002, 41(2): 64-70.
[7] Engeström Y. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work[J]. Ergonomics, 2000, 43(7): 960-974.
[8] Rovai A P. Building sense of community at a distance[J]. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2002,
3(1): 1-16.
[9] Zhang Jingxin. Application Challenges and Breakthrough Paths of the OMO Teaching Model in University Courses [J]. Higher Education Exploration, 2023(5): 67-73.
[10] Yu Shengquan. The Future Role of Artificial Intelligence Teachers [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences
Edition), 2018, 36(1): 16-28.
[11] Feng Xiaoying, Wang Ruixue, Wu Yijun. A Review of the Current Status of Blended Teaching Research at Home and Abroad [J]. Journal of Distance Education, 2018, 36(3): 13-24.
[12] Chen Li, Lin Shiyuan, Zheng Qinhua. Opportunities and Challenges for Distance Education in China in the "Internet+" Era [J]. Research
on Modern Distance Education, 2016(1): 3-10.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/neet.v4i10.10324
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
