Perceptions, Motivation, and Self-perceived Translation-al Skill Development in a Blended Translation Course through PeerAssessment

Jiawen Yu; Sheiladevi Sukumaran; Xinxiang Gao; Hongying Li; Yidan Hu

doi:10.18686/neet.v2i1.3498

Perceptions, Motivation, and Self-perceived Translation-al Skill Development in a Blended Translation Course through PeerAssessment

Jiawen Yu, Sheiladevi Sukumaran, Xinxiang Gao, Hongying Li, Yidan Hu

Abstract

Peer assessment (PA) has long been a prominent educational tool in higher education. However, there is limited evidence regarding technology-facilitated PAin Translation studies. This study addresses this gap by examining studentsperceptions and motivation toward a fve-week online PAactivity in a Translation course. It further explores the correlation between studentsintrinsic and extrinsic motivation and their perceived skill enhancement. Thirty-six third-year students participated, responding to Likert-type scale questionnaires. Both quantita-tive and qualitative methods were used for data analysis. The fndings reveal a highly positive perception and motivation among students in the online task. Intrinsic motivational factors were valued more than extrinsic ones, with intrinsic motivation being a signifcant predictor of self-perceived translation skill improvement. The study suggests potential implications for translation pedagogy and research. This pioneering effort contributes to the limited literature, proposing an alternative to face-to-face peer assessment and paving the way for future research in blended learning courses.

Keywords

Peer assessment; Translation; Online activity; Intrinsic motivation; Blended learning

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database

References

[1] Baker, K. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students writing process.Active Learning in Higher Educcation, 17(3), 114.

[2] DiGiovanni, E. & Nagaswami, G. (2001). Online peer review:An alternative to face-to-face? ELT Journal, 55(3), 263272.

[3] Topping, K. (1998). PeerAssessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities.

[4] Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249.

[5] Topping, K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 2027.

[6] Topping, K. (2018). Using PeerAssessment to Inspire Refection and Learning, 103127. Milton: Routledge.

[7] Gao, X., Raja,T., Chong, K. M., & Wu, M. (2023). Examining the Phenomenon of Juvenile Digital Addiction in Rural China. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(24), 273-282.

[8] Gao, X., Liu, J., Wang, S., Pertheban, T. R., Chong, K. M., & Yu, J. (2023, September). How Does Digital Traceability Impact the Innovation Behavior of Food Firms Based on the Marketing Perspective? In 2023 3rd International Conference on Education, Information Management and Service Science (EIMSS 2023) (pp. 617-624).Atlantis Press.

[9] Jonnavithula, L. (2008). Improving the interfaces of online discussion forums to enhance learning support. Massey University Sukumaran, S., Yu, J., Chen, D., Gao, X., Li, H., & Zeng, J. (2023, October). Examine the Student Perceptions of Online English Language Learning in Primary Schools based on gender difference. In2023 7th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2023)(pp. 2068-2074).Atlantis Press.

[10] Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, M. J. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, 241252.

[11] Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Taiwan college studentsself-effcacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment environments. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 164169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.01.001

[12] Kim-Godwin, Y. S., Turrise, S., Lawson, S., & Scott, M. (2018). Student perceptions of peer evaluation in an online RN-to-BSN course. Nurse Educator, 43(6), 317 321. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000519.

[13] Kuo, Y. K., Batool, S., Tahir, T., & Yu, J. (2023). Exploring the impact of emotionalized learning experiences on the affective domain: A comprehensive analysis. Heliyon.

[14] Li, L., & Gao, F. (2016). The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning evels. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 885900.

[15] Lopes, A. P. (2011). Teaching with Moodle in Higher Educations : Polytechnic Institute of Oporto IPP. INTED2011 Proceedings, 970976.

[16] Moloudi, M. (2011). Online and face-to-face peer review: Measures of implementation in ESL writing classes. Asian EFL Journal, 52, 52, 1-73.

[17] Ngan, S. C., & Law, K. M. Y. (2015). Exploratory NetworkAnalysis of Learning Motivation Factors in e-Learning Facilitated Computer Programming Courses.Asia-Pacifc Education Researcher, 24(4), 705717. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40299-014-0223-0.

[18] Yu, J., Sukumaran, S., Li, H., & Zeng, J. (2023). Examine Primary School TeachersAttitudes Towards Technology Integration in Primary Education.Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal,8(26), 383-388.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/neet.v2i1.3498

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Perceptions, Motivation, and Self-perceived Translation-al Skill Development in a Blended Translation Course through PeerAssessment

Abstract

Keywords

Full Text:

Included Database

References

Refbacks

Scineer

Valueble Links

Username
Password
Remember me