pisco_log
banner

Experiences and Implications of the U.S. Higher Education Assessment System

Moya Niu

Abstract


This article provides an in-depth discussion of the experience and inspiration of the American higher education assessment system,
aiming to provide a reference for establishing a high-quality assessment system in China. The article first outlines the development history of
the higher education assessment system in the United States, from the budding stage to the gradual improvement, showing its evolution from
being led by private organizations and indirectly intervened by the government. Then, the article analyzes the basic modes and characteristics
of the U.S. higher education assessment system, including four modes: intermediary organizations assessing or guiding the assessment procedures of education providers, intermediary organizations implementing the assessment, education providers implementing the assessment,
and the assessment of students competence. Its characteristics are mainly reflected in the indirect government intervention, the coexistence
of accreditation and evaluation systems, and the clear principle of subjectivization. Finally, the article puts forward the experiences that China
can learn from the American higher education assessment system: rationally playing the governments functions and avoiding too much intervention; strengthening the independence of intermediary assessment organizations. These suggestions aim to promote the reform and development of Chinas higher education assessment system and improve higher education quality.

Keywords


Higher education; Quality assessment; Inspiration

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Wang Zhanjun. Evaluation Techniques and Practices for Degree and Graduate Education[M]. Higher Education Press, 2000.

[2] Ewell P T. Assessment, Accountability and Improvement: Revisiting the Tension[EB/OL].(1990-04-21)[2015-09-25].http://www.

learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/PeterEw ell_005.pdf.

[3] Qiu Keping. Analyzing and Learning from the U.S. Higher Education Assessment System[J]. China Adult Education, 2018(18):112-114.

[4] Li Qingcai. Report on the Training and Study of Human Resource Allocation and Management Models in American Universities[J]. Liaoning Education Research, 2001, (08):13-18.

[5] Neave, G. and van Vughs, F.(eds). Government and Higher Education Relationships AcrossThree Continents. Oxford: Pergamum Press,

1994.

[6] Cui Ruifeng. Selection of Higher Education Evaluation Models: Lessons from the United States[J]. Journal of Xian Jiaotong University

Social Sciences, 2017, 37(02):116-122.

[7] Liu Shuyun. A Reconstruction of Chinas Higher Education Evaluation System from thePerspective of New Institutional Economics[D].

East China Normal University, 2014.

[8] Xiong Chunrong. Cultural Characteristics and Implications of Higher Education Assessment in the United States[D]. Heilongjiang University, 2011.

[9] Cheng Run. An Analysis of the Legal Origins and Legitimacy Strategies of Accreditation Organizations in U.S. Higher Education[D].

Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2022.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/neet.v3i4.6785

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.