Research on the Multidimensional Evaluation Model for 
Quality Monitoring of Basic Education in China

Feifei Huang; Zhaofeng Huang*

doi:10.70711/neet.v4i1.8492

Research on the Multidimensional Evaluation Model for Quality Monitoring of Basic Education in China

Feifei Huang, Zhaofeng Huang*

Abstract

This study was in order to classify individuals into distinct subgroups based on shared response patterns among them. A total of
10000 third-year senior high school students were selected and they were surveyed with the mathematics test. The results revealed that: (1)
The students' essential knowledge mastery in mathematics could be divided into three distinct types: Moderate Proficiency, Advanced Proficiency and Foundational Deficiency, and the probability were 41.90%, 26.97% and 31.14%, respectively. (2) The advanced proficiency profile
demonstrated significantly superior performance across all competency domains relative to both the moderate proficiency profile and foundational deficiency profile. The moderate proficiency profile significantly outperformed the foundational deficiency profile across disciplinary
literacy, mathematics competencies, critical abilities, and assessment benchmarks. The results also indicated that it is of great practical significance to apply the individual centered approaches to the context of educational evaluation.

Keywords

Latent profile analysis; Multidimensional evaluation; China college entrance examination

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database

References

[1] Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S.. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.).

Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 2003.

[2] Gabriel, A. S., Campbell, J. T., Djurdjevic, E., Johnson, R. E., & Rosen, C. C. Fuzzy profiles: Comparing and contrasting latent profile

analysis and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis for person-centered research[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2018, 21(4),

877904.

[3] Morin, A. J. S., Bujacz, A., & Gagn, M. Person-centered methodologies in the organizational sciences: Introduction to the feature

topic[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2018, 21(4), 803813.

[4] Lanza, S. T., Patrick, M. E., and Maggs, J. L. Latent transition analysis: benefits of a latent variable approach to modeling transitions in

substance use[J]. Journal of Drug Issues, 2010, 40(1): 93-120.

[5] Muthn, L. K., & Muthn, B. O. How to use a monte carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power[J]. Structural Equation

Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002, 9(4): 599-620.

[6] Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. Latent class and latent transition analysis: wth applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences.

Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009.

[7] Akaike, H. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 1987, 52(3): 317-332.

[8] Schwarz, G. Estimating the dimension of a model[J]. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 1978, 6(2): 461-464.

[9] Sclove, S. L. Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis[J]. Psychometrika, 1987, 52(3): 333-343.

[10] Schmiege, S. J., Masyn, K. E., & Bryan, A. D. Confirmatory latent class analysis: Illustrations of empirically driven and theoretically

driven model constraints[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2018, 21(4): 9831001.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/neet.v4i1.8492

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.