Research on Teaching Evaluation of University Physical 
Education Courses from the Perspective of the 5E Model

Mei Tang; Tingting Yang; Lijian Liao*

doi:10.70711/neet.v4i2.8685

Research on Teaching Evaluation of University Physical Education Courses from the Perspective of the 5E Model

Mei Tang, Tingting Yang, Lijian Liao*

Abstract

Against the backdrop of ongoing educational reforms, university physical education programs face an urgent need for innovation and ptimization in teaching methodologies and performance evaluation approaches. This study focuses on evaluating university physical education courses through the 5E model, aiming to explore its effectiveness in enhancing students' physical literacy and comprehensive
competencies. Findings indicate that the 5E teaching model not only improves students' physical education performance but also stimulates
their learning interest and initiative, fostering comprehensive abilities such as self-directed learning, teamwork, and innovative practice. In
optimizing the teaching process, the 5E model employs multi-stage design to make instruction more scientific and rational, thereby promoting
students' holistic development.

Keywords

University physical education courses; Teaching evaluation; 5E teaching model

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database

References

[1] ee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional

model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.

[2] Gao, D. X. (2011). Research on physical education curriculum evaluation systems adapted to quality-oriented education. Journal of

Nanchang College of Education, 26(12), 5657.

[3] Liao, Y. S. (2013). Research on the current situation of public physical education courses in Chinese universities. Sports Science Research, 17(2), 7681.

[4] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2020). Opinions on comprehensively strengthening and improving school

physical education in the new era.

[5] Pan, S., & Zhang, H. C. (2003). Reflections on establishing a new evaluation system for university physical education curricula. Journal

of Physical Education, (6), 7476.

[6] Qin, Y. (2010). An experimental study of developmental evaluation in university aerobics teaching. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education (Social Sciences Edition), 24(2), 121124.

[7] Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational

Technology, 35(5), 3138.

[8] Tang, L. J. (2012). Research on the implementation effects of the new physical education curriculum in basic education(Doctoral dissertation). East China Normal University.

[9] Wang, B., Zhou, X. R., & Li, H. M. (2014). Reflections on university physical education curriculum design from the perspective of the

Sunshine Sports Program. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 37(5), 112117.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/neet.v4i2.8685

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.