pisco_log
banner

Applying Theories and Principles of Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Sino-British Accountancy Programmes

Kejun Chen, Shu Zhang

Abstract


This article examines the integration of formal and informal assessment methods with inclusive teaching principles in Sino-British
accounting programmes. Drawing on educational theories, it explores how diverse assessment strategies and culturally responsive pedagogies
enhance student motivation, language learning and professional competence. Practical guidance is offered to improve teaching effectiveness
in cross-cultural higher-education context.

Keywords


Assessments; Inclusive learning; Accounting education; Sino-British programme; Cross-cultural pedagogy; Higher education; Professional competence

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Abayadeera, N., Mihret, D.G. & Dulige, J.H. 2018. Teaching effectiveness of non-native English-speaking teachers in business disci

plines: Intercultural communication apprehension and ethnocentrism.Accounting Education, 27(2), 183207.

[2] Ainscow, M., Booth, T. & Dyson, A. 2006. Inclusion and the standards agenda: Negotiating policy pressures in England. International

Journal of Inclusive Education, 10(45), 295308.

[3] Ainscow, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educa

tional objectives.New York: Longman.

[4] Broadbent, J., Panadero, E. & Boud, D. 2017. Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large

class.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 307322.

[5] Collins, D.L., Cook, K.A. & Hart, M.T. 2018. Accounting research readings groups. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and

Curriculum Innovations, 22, 122.

[6] Dean, B.A., Perkiss, S., Misic, M.S. & Luzia, K. 2020. Transforming accounting curricula to enhance integrative learning. Accounting

& Finance, 60(3).

[7] Foster, K.D. & Stapleton, D.M. 2012. Understanding Chinese students learning needs in western business classrooms. International

Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 301313.

[8] Healy, M., Doran, J. & McCutcheon, M. 2018. Cooperative learning outcomes from cumulative experiences of group work: Differences

in student perceptions.Accounting Education, 27(3), 286308.

[9] Houston, D. & Thompson, J.N. 2017. Blending formative and summative assessment in a capstone subject:Its not your tools, its how

you use them. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 14(3).

[10] Ladson-Billings, G. 2014. Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0:A.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 7484.

[11] Lin, Z., Xiong, X. & Liu, M. 2005. Knowledge base and skill development in accounting education: Evidence from China.

[12] Lowe, P.A., Lee, S.W. &Witteborg, K.M. 2008. The test anxiety inventory for children and adolescents (TAICA). Journal of Psychoedu

cational Assessment, 26(3), 215230.

[13] Massoudi, D., Koh, S., Hancock, P.J. & Fung, L. 2017. The effectiveness of usage of online multiple choice questions on student per

formance in introductory accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 32(4), 117.

[14] Opdecam, E. & Everaert, P. 2018. Seven disagreements about cooperative learning.Accounting Education, 27(3), 223233.

[15] Race, P. & Brown, S. 2025. The lecturers toolkit:A practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching (6th edn). London: Routledge.

[16] Rebele, J.E. & Pierre, E.K. 2019.A commentary on learning objectives for accounting education programs: The importance of soft skills

and technical knowledge. Journal of Accounting Education, 48, 7179.

[17] Ruiz-Primo, M.A. & Furtak, E.M. 2007. Exploring teachersinformal formative assessment practices and studentsunderstanding in the

context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 5784.

[18] Schoepp, K. 2019. The state of course learning outcomes at leading universities. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 615627.

[19] Scouller, K. 1998. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus

assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453472.

[20]Stiggins, R. 2005. From formative assessment to assessment for learning:A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan,

324326.

[21] Stone, M.S. 2018. Learning from expected and unexpected sources.Accounting Education, 33(3), 6166.

[22] Sridharan, B., Muttakin, M.B. & Mihret, D.G. 2018. Studentsperceptions of peer assessment effectiveness: An explorative study. Ac-

counting Education, 27(3).

[23] Taplin, R., Singh,A., Kerr, R. & Lee,A. 2018. The use of short role-plays for an ethics intervention in university auditing courses.Ac

counting Education, 27(4), 383402.

[24] Weeden, P., Winter, J.C. & Broadfoot, P.M. 2000. The Learn Project: Phase 2. Guidance for schools on assessment for learning. Qualifi

cations & Curriculum Authority.

[25] Wynder, M. 2018. Visualising accounting concepts: Insights from cognitive load theory for English as a second language students.Ac

counting Education, 27(6), 590612.

[26] Yang, R.P., Noels, K.A. & Saumure, K. 2006. Multiple routes to cross-cultural adaptation for international students: Mapping the paths

between self-construals, English language confidence, and adjustment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(4), 487506.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/neet.v4i4.9112

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.