pisco_log
banner

Embodied Interaction Versus Embodied Simulation in Immersive VR: Differential Effects on Procedural Skills, Declarative Knowledge, and Intrinsic Motivation

Xinyuan Chen, Xiaoyi Li, Yongbin Hu*

Abstract


This study investigates whether virtual reality (VR) learning requires physical interaction or if observational simulation suffices.
Seventy-four participants were randomly assigned to an Embodied Interaction (EI, gesture-based) or Embodied Simulation (ES, first-person
observation) group within a custom VR training system. Both conditions yielded equivalent declarative knowledge, but the EI group demonstrated superior procedural skills and intrinsic motivation. Thus, vicarious simulation suffices for conceptual processing, while enactive engagement remains crucial for procedural fluency. We advocate a tiered instructional design, reserving high-fidelity interaction specifically for
psychomotor skill acquisition.

Keywords


Virtual Reality; Embodied Cognition; Embodied Simulation; Vicarious Learning; Video Instruction

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Chang, A. A., Kazemi, E., Esmaeili, V., & Davies, M. S. (2024). The effectiveness of virtual reality training: A systematic review. Jour-

nal of Organizational Behavior Management, 44(3), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2023.2240767

[2] Fiorella, L., van Gog, T., Hoogerheide, V., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). It's all a matter of perspective: Viewing first-person video modeling examples promotes learning of an assembly task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1037/

edu0000161

[3] Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1),

23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z

[4] Goldman, A. I. (2012). A moderate approach to embodied cognitive science. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(1), 71-88. https://

doi.org/10.1007/s13164-012-0089-0

[5] Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed

reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445-452. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13511661

[6] Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based

model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-

09586-2

[7] Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832

[8] Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: Introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9

[9] Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience.

[10] Xie, B., Liu, H., Alghofaili, R., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Lobo, F. D., Li, C., Li, W., Huang, H., Akdere, M., Mousas, C., & Yu, L.-F. (2021).

A review on virtual reality skill training applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, 645153. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.645153




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/neet.v4i7.9768

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.