pisco_log
banner

Towards Intelligent Editing: An Analysis of New Standards, Methods, Technologies, and Platforms in the Editing and Proofreading of Scientific Journals

Lihui Jiang

Abstract


Driven by digital technology and scientific research paradigm transformations, scientific journal editing and proofreading are in a
critical phase of systematic evolution. This study comprehensively reviews emerging standards, methodologies, technologies, and platforms in
global and domestic journal publishing, examining their mechanisms to enhance academic quality, optimize workflows, and expand scholarly
dissemination. Key focuses are: new standards for research integrity and data openness; innovative approaches restructuring editorial processes; cutting-edge technologies enhancing grammar checking, content enhancement, and multimodal publishing; and new platforms advancing academic exchange transformations. Incorporating social media's editorial applications and typical domestic cases, it proposes practical
pathways and strategic recommendations for intelligent editing, offering theoretical and practical guidance for scientific journals to achieve
synergistic quality, efficiency, and influence improvements amid digital and intelligent transformation.

Keywords


Scientific Journals publishing; Editing and Proofreading; AI; Open Science; Social Media

Full Text:

PDF

Included Database


References


[1] Ren, S. L. (2022). New trends and requirements for the development of scientific journals in the context of open science. Studies in Science of Science, 40(3), 321-328.

[2] Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Science and Technology.

(2021). Opinions on Promoting the Prosperity and Development of Academic Journals [EB/OL]. (2021-06-23) [2024-05-XX]. http://

www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202106/t20210625_539365.html.

[3] Su, J. Y. (2023). Construction and practice of a journal evaluation system for philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics. Chinese Social Sciences Evaluation, (4), 4-15.

[4] Hu, X. Y., & Qiu, J. P. (2022). Practice and reflection on the evaluation of world-class scientific journalsTaking the Wuhan University

RCSSE Journal Evaluation System as an example. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 33(10), 1331-1339.

[5] Liu, X. M., & Ma, Z. (2022). Continuity and development: Evolution of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Journal Citation Reports.

Chinese Science Bulletin, 67(9), 865-871.

[6] Wu, Y. S. (2020). Development history and trend analysis of scientific and technological literature databases. Library and Information

Service, 64(15), 45-52.

[7] Wang, C. Q., Liu, S., & Wang, J. M. (2024). Application scenarios and challenges of large language models in the content production

and dissemination of scientific journals. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 35(1), 10-18.

[8] Zhang, X., Wang, S., & Liu, X. P. (2023). Model transformation and path innovation of scientific journal publishing driven by artificial

intelligence. Acta Editologica, 35(4), 363-370.

[9] Wang, C. Q., Liu, S., & Wang, J. M. (2024). Application scenarios and challenges of large language models in the content production

and dissemination of scientific journals. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 35(1), 10-18.

[10] Liu, J. H., Zhang, Y. M., & Xu, H. (2024). Research on the optimization of academic publishing processes based on generative AI. Publishing Journal, 32(1), 88-97.

[11] Wang, Q. W., & Wang, X. F. (2024). Research on the short video communication effect of academic journals under the background of

media integration. Publishing Research, (1), 67-73.

[12] Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I., et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.70711/rcha.v3i12.8626

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.